Seattle Education

For the news and views you might have missed

Opting out of the testing madness, why and how

For the “why” of opting out of the testing madness that has taken hold of our school districts, a great article to start with is Testing Our Limits by Melissa Bollow Tempel in the latest issue of Rethinking Schools. To follow is an excerpt:

I walked away from the rest of my class and over to the three computers in the corner of my classroom.

Two of my 1st graders, Jasmine and Jayden, sat at their computers with their headphones off, waiting for me to reset their computers to Measure of Academic Progress (MAP) test number 2.

“I got 162,” said Jasmine. “You got 142.”

“You did better than me,” replied Jayden with a frown.

Shelly sat at the third computer. “I don’t wanna do the computer test,” she pleaded. “Do I have to?”

In the past three years I have experienced unimaginable computer frustration. Don’t get me wrong: I treat my MacBook Pro like a third child, and I definitely use technology in the classroom to enhance teaching and learning. I’ve been accused of being in love with my iPhone, which serves as a timekeeper, meteorologist, and DJ in my classroom. And the opaque projector is an excellent, plastic transparency-free alternative to the overhead projector. Computers and technology have come such a long way in the past 20 years, and they hold a big place in the lives of this generation of students. Unfortunately, one use of technology is failing in my classroom: the rapidly increasing use of computers for testing.

Computerized testing, including the widely used MAP test, has infiltrated the public schools in Milwaukee and across the nation like an uncontrollable outbreak of lice, bringing with it a frightening future for public education. High-stakes standardized tests can be scored almost immediately via the internet, and testing companies can now easily link districts to their online data warehouses, which allows districts to quickly access test scores (which would be good if the tests were generating usable data). This system provides momentum to those who believe more tests should be given to “track progress” throughout the year. In my district this means that every classroom teacher tests students at the beginning, middle, and end of the year, administering four tests in math and reading each time.

Limited funding and fewer staff in our district, as in most urban public schools, creates even more of a problem because there are not enough adults to serve as proctors. Setting up these tests is a tedious, time-consuming job involving a web of long, nonsensical passwords and codes. Teachers are being mandated to use many hours of valuable instructional time and limited teacher planning time to complete these tasks. In schools like mine that don’t have a computer lab, teachers have only a few computers in their classrooms. We are asked to simultaneously teach while setting up and administering a few tests at a time, seriously compromising the quality of instruction we are able to deliver.

To illustrate the scenario, picture this: I have three computers on one side of the classroom, set apart from our learning area, so three children can take the test at one time. First I go to each computer and log in to the network using an assigned proctor name and password. Then I log in to the test application using a different random alphanumeric name and nine-digit password. Once in, I select the test the child needs to take, select the student’s name, then sit the child down at the computer to begin, making sure he or she has the headphones on properly. (Yes, one of my students took the test wearing the headphones attached to her neighbor’s computer. If I’m not watching carefully, others have taken the whole test without headphones on at all!) Then I hurry back to the rest of the class and continue teaching. When the child has a question, I have to go help. When the child is done taking the test, I have to go over and enter yet another proctor password to finish the test and start the process over for the next child. Part of the score is based on how long it takes a child to complete each question, so if the child has to use the bathroom I need to enter a code to pause the test. Each test takes about 20 minutes to complete; however, students do not finish at the same time, so I am going back and forth at three different times to enter the proctor password for the children and set up the next student. I’m doing all this while I attempt to teach a lesson, lead an activity, or help the rest of the class do their work. The alternative is to stop instruction altogether for a few days and give my students “busy work” while three students at a time take the tests. And have I mentioned that we have no art, music, or physical education teachers at our school, so I have no prep time?

Unfortunately, the issue of time wasting and misuse does not even scratch the surface of the computerized testing chaos. Computerized testing now starts with students as young as 4 years old. MAP test data are reviewed and used in the screening process for children for special education. Those already receiving special education services with IEPs are required to take the grade-level test regardless of their instructional level. In Milwaukee, all students attending 4-year-old kindergarten are required to take the district’s computerized test beginning their second week of school—ever. One of the literacy tests is 53 multiple-choice questions long, and to finish it students must select an answer for every question. After each testing session teachers report that students end up in tears. Most 4-year-olds cannot sit long enough to finish the whole test and need to be redirected to their chairs many times. District administration allows the test to be given one-on-one to kindergartners; however, pulling from the ever-shrinking list of support staff means pulling the only available staff, the English language learner teacher and the librarian, to help. This test creates a domino effect on the entire school.

Although our district’s administration believes these tests are given on a level playing field (because in this age of technology most children are supposedly exposed to computers at a young age), our primary students often come to school with little or no computer experience. In fact, many early childhood researchers believe that responsible parenting means little or no screen time for primary school children. As a result, young students click at random. One of my colleagues reported that she often witnesses students rubbing the mouse on their faces or on the computer screens. And this data is supposed to help guide our teaching?

Widening the Gap

The biggest injustice here is the technology gap that has a direct effect on the achievement gap. Students who have regular access to computers at home are clearly advantaged, from a testing standpoint, because they have a higher likelihood of being computer literate. Meanwhile, kids who don’t are being scored on both how to use the technology they have never had access to in addition to what is in the content of the test. This imbalance creates an assessment that is less valid or invalid because it measures something beyond what it is supposed to, and it penalizes students for something that they are not supposed to be tested on.

To read this article in full, go to Rethinking Schools, the Spring 2012 issue.

Now, the “how” of opting out.

As I previously posted, a note to the principal of your student’s school requesting that your child be offered an alternative option to taking the MAP test during that testing period should be adequate. I have heard some parents say that they have had to write a note for each testing phase which occurs three times each school year and other parents say that they only had to write the note once. It seems to be up to the principal at this time.

Many other states are organizing opt out programs including Indiana. You can check out the Indiana Parent’s Guide to Opting Out for an example of a great brochure/flyer. Also, We Support Schools Snohomish in the state of Washington has established a Facebook page regarding opting out of standardized testing.

It is time to stop this madness that is costing hundreds of millions of dollars and start putting the money towards resources and smaller class sizes so that all of our children will have an opportunity to succeed.

Dora

6 comments on “Opting out of the testing madness, why and how

  1. Marcia R.
    February 1, 2013

    Everything I read, especially regarding opting out, refers to the MAP tests… My kids are being required to take the MSP tests. How do I opt out of MSP?? Also, I’ve been told by our teacher that we are not allowed to opt out because we are in the online k12 and not the brick and mortar school, then told we could be dropped from the school if we don’t take the test.

    • seattleducation2011
      February 1, 2013

      Marcia,

      Each state is different. Assuming that you don’t want personal information about your children on a blog, I will contact you directly.

      Dora

    • seattleducation2011
      February 1, 2013

      Each state has different laws if they have any at all.

      If the online school is a charter school, the student test scores are to be at a certain average to remain open although most states don’t adhere to that contract. If it is a charter school, they probably feel pressured to ensure that all students, at least the ones that they think will do well on a test, take the test.

      Also, if it’s a charter school, you probably signed an agreement with them on what was expected of you and your child. I would look at that also.

      Monty Neil with Fair Test, http://www.fairtest.org/contact, is an excellent source on opting out and the website United Opt Out has a list of states with contact information, http://unitedoptout.com/global-outreachstate-by-state/.

      Being a member of Parents Across America,http://parentsacrossamerica.org/, I have access to parents around the country who might be in a similar situation and can put you in contact with someone.

  2. Nina Bishop
    April 7, 2012

    Dora,
    You are most welcome to forward it to whom ever you choose! The more the merrier. United we stand; divided we fall.
    Nina

  3. Nina Bishop
    April 5, 2012

    My name is Nina Bishop. I am working on a project with other opt out groups to collect letters from parents regarding their refusal to allow their students to take their state’s assessment under No Child Left Behind. I would like to welcome Seattle parents to write to me telling me how their parental rights were violated and their stories of unfair treatment to their children. Once collected, the letters will be presented to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) for a multi family complaint regarding the violation of our right to guide the education fo our children; supported by the 14th Amend. and the US Constitution. Please send your letters, with threatening school mail and supporting documents to:

    Nina Bishop
    3065 Windward Way
    Colorado Springs, CO 80917
    719-233-1508

    Let’s join together and reclaim our parental rights and put a stop to the testing insanity!

    • seattleducation2011
      April 5, 2012

      Thank you for this information Nina.

      I will forward this to other parents.

      Dora

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: