Seattle Education

For the news and views you might have missed

An Open Letter from Former Stand for Children Activists About a Ballot Measure

If only the Stand for Children folks in our state had such convictions.

The following is an open letter from former Stand for Children members in Massachusetts.

As parents, teachers, and community members, we are Massachusetts grassroots activists for education. We read bills, testify at hearings, write letters to the editor, pore over budgets, speak at town meetings, make phone calls, and hold fundraisers. Many of us have done so for years.

It was as part of this work and with great hope that we joined Stand for Children.  And—initially—Stand helped us do great work.  We cast a critical eye on education bills at the State House and testified as needed. We turned back ballot initiatives that would have gutted education funding. We closely watched local budgets to keep dollars close to classrooms. We put our voices, time, money, and reputations into building Stand for Children. Because we were united and we spoke from our experience, we were heard.

Along the way, we learned a great deal about the legislative process, education funding, and policy. We learned to research our positions, present them, and back them up.

But in 2009, while we struggled to give voice to the needs of our schools, Stand’s staff was turning away from our concerns, announcing that it expected its members to forgo community advocacy in favor of a new, special agenda. This agenda, emerging seemingly out of nowhere, touted more charter schools, more testing, and punishing teachers and schools for low student scores.

None of these initiatives arose from the needs of our communities.  Indeed, we understood well their dangers. Yet all of them became the positions of Stand for Children. Policy proposals no longer came from the local level. They were dictated from the top.

What accounted for this shift?  We were mystified at first. But we’ve since learned that Stand abandoned its own local members – us – to follow the lure of millions of dollars from Bain Capital, the Walton Foundation, Bill Gates, and others who had an agenda in conflict with our previous efforts.

The ballot initiative brought forward by Stand for Children is just the most recent example.

Stand was one group of many at the table when the new Massachusetts educator evaluation system was hammered out over several months last spring. Unions, principals, state officials, parents—all contributed. But when the new regulations were finally announced, one group walked away—Stand for Children.

Immediately, Stand filed for a ballot initiative and used some of their new corporate money to hire people to collect the signatures. It cost them $3 a signature, but they have plenty more. They are following the master plan revealed in Colorado by their national CEO, Jonah Edelman, a month before it was announced in Massachusetts.

The proposed ballot measure attempts to blow up the collaborative work that created the new regulations last spring. It does nothing to improve teaching in our schools. What it does is put the careers of our teachers at the mercy of an untested rating system, violating the recommendations of the people who designed that system.

We fear the result would be to drive some of our best teachers away from the schools that need them most.

This ballot measure fits the ideology of its corporate sponsors, but it is not what we want for those who teach our children. Most of all, it is not what we want for our children.

Therefore we the undersigned, as former members and leaders of Stand for Children, urge Massachusetts voters to oppose this ballot measure.

Ted A. Adams, Medford

Alessandro Alessandrini, Lexington School Committee member

Bonnie Brodner, Lexington School Committee member

Dale Bryan, Medford

Margaret E. Coppe, Lexington School Committee member

Ann Marie Cugno, Medford School Committee member

Jonathan Dreyer, Lexington

Mary Finn, Medford

Ann Gallager, Medford

Roger Garberg, Gloucester School Committee member

Isabel Gonzalez, Worcester, Former Stand staff organizer

Jason Grow, Gloucester

Sharon Guzik, Medford

Matt Haberstroh, Medford

Victoria Halal, Medford

Geeta Jain, Medford

John J. Krawczyk, Lexington

Mary-Beth Landy, Medford

Lynne Lupien, Lowell, MA

Bonnie McFarlane, Medford

Michelle McGonagle, Medford

Beth Morris, Gloucester

Tracy Novick, Worcester School Committee member

Ann O’Halloran, Waltham, formerly of Newton Stand for Children

Natalie O’Hayre, Worcester

Simon Paddock, Gloucester

Rev. Aaron Payson, Worcester

Meryl Perlson, Medford

Sondra Peskoe, Brookline, formerly of Arlington Stand for Children

Joyce Shortt, Somerville, MA

Deb Steigman, Worcester

Mary Ann Stewart, Lexington

Paulette Van der Kloot, Medford School Committee member

Adiya White-Hammond, Boston

One comment on “An Open Letter from Former Stand for Children Activists About a Ballot Measure

  1. Ken Mortland
    May 17, 2012

    The parallel between the events in this article and what happened in the short session of Washington’s legislature is stunning. Stand for Children had little to do with the collaborative efforts that created SB 6696 in the 2010 session. Although they didn’t use an initiative to accomplish their goal, they simply pushed aside SB 6696 and substituted their own version of teacher evaluation. Stand for Children needs a new name, how about “Shilling for Corporations”?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: