For the news and views you might have missed
2. Murdock spent $360 million to buy Wireless Generation, which was rebranded as Amplify.
3. Amplify “partnered with inBloom to custom-build the open-source software that forms the infrastructure for inBloom’s system.” The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Carnegie Corporation of New York provided funding for inBloom.
4. Student privacy advocates were alarmed by inBloom’s plans to compile, store, and share student data –without parental permission. Data included names, test scores, grades, disciplinary and attendance records, special education status and IEPs. inBloom later folded.
5. The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium paid Amplify $12.5 million to write formative assessments “aligned to the Common Core State Standards and the Smarter Balanced assessment system.”
6. Students take three 1.5 hour Interim Amplify Tests for ELA and Math. In addition, there are 24 Quick Checks per grade level for each subject.
7. In 2014, Seattle Public Schools signed a $244,750 contract to pilot Amplify’s product mClass Beacon in 50 schools.
8. District wide, students in Seattle Public Schools who took the Amplify assessments had a passing rate of 45-50% for ELA and 35-40% for math. Seattle Public Schools has decided not to share student scores with parents or posted results on the Source.
9. Now Seattle Public Schools wants to implement Amplify across the district at an estimated cost of $433,160.80.
The District must make public their agreement with Amplify concerning student privacy before any action is taken to approve yet another contract with this company. Please write the school board at:
Sharon Peaslee: email@example.com
Sherry Carr: firstname.lastname@example.org
Harium Martin-Morris: email@example.com
Sue Peters: firstname.lastname@example.org
Stephan Blanford: email@example.com
Marty McLaren: firstname.lastname@example.org
Betty Patu: email@example.com
One of our readers found these interesting items in the School Board Briefing/Proposed Action Report for the Amplify contract.
In section XI titled timeline for implementation/community engagement –there is nothing about community engagement It’s like it was just left out, ignored.
XI. TIMELINE FOR IMPLEMENTATION / COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Upon approval a contract with Amplify will be executed and development of common assessments within the platform will begin.
Second, in the last section, there is language about Amplify’s Beacon Platform being a “SBAC Blueprinting tool.” Here it is:
SBAC blueprinting tool: A district user can create a blueprint based on SBAC claims and targets for ELA and clusters for Math. Moreover, a user can set Lexile, number of constructed response items, and DOK goals for each assessment within a blueprint. being a “SBAC Blueprinting tool.”
It would be nice for the district to explain in a clear, jargon-free manner what exactly this means.